⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] 정적 CSS 및 해시 연산 호이스팅 - #362
Conversation
…sh out of process_dir
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 9 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Comment |
|
@opencode-agent review exact current head 2594eca |
|
@cwl-noema-review review exact current head 2594eca |
…sh out of process_dir
|
Closing as superseded by #363. Both branches hoist the immutable stylesheet and SHA-256 computation out of |
Understood. Acknowledging that this PR is superseded by #363 and closing this task. |
💡 What:
process_dir함수 내부에 있던 정적cssContent,styleHash,css변수를 최상위private val상수로 호이스팅했습니다.🎯 Why: 디렉토리를 순회할 때마다 동일한 큰 문자열을 할당하고 SHA-256 해시를 계산하는 불필요한 CPU 및 메모리 오버헤드를 제거하기 위함입니다.
📊 Impact: 디렉토리 순회 시 발생하는 불필요한 문자열 할당과 해시 계산 비용을 없애 크롤링 성능이 향상됩니다.
🔬 Measurement: 대규모 디렉토리 트리에 대한 크롤링 실행 시간 및 메모리 프로파일링을 통해 확인할 수 있습니다.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 5495795628721209192 started by @seonghobae